Learning Outcomes 302(b) and (d)

This second tab contains language of law school learning outcomes associated with Standard 302(b) and (d) – compentency in (b) Legal analysis and reasoning, legal research, problem-solving, and written and oral communication in the legal context, and (d) Other professional skills needed for competent and ethical participation as a member of the legal profession. This includes some “other professional skills” to the extent they are associated with communication and problem-solving, such as client interviewing, fact investigation, document drafting, negotiation, trial advocacy, etc.

This database is searchable by law school(s) or by the specific learning outcomes identified below.  Thus, using this database, you may select a learning outcome to see which law schools state that specific learning outcome in their list of student learning outcomes. Each law school's link will take you directly to that school's learning outcomes web page. To the right of the law school's name is a description of where you may locate that specific learning outcome within a given law school’s learning outcomes.  Alternatively, you could look for a given law school or law schools to see what their learning outcomes say generally using the master database at the bottom of each tab.

Law School Location of Advocacy
Arkansas Little Rock B(4)(b)(2).
CUNY (b)(8): fourth bullet.
California Western II. D.
Chapman Lawyering Skills Curriculum
Minnesota 3(iii).
South Carolina Goal 2: outcome 4.
Temple 4.3.
Washburn 4.4.
Law School Location of Analogize/Synthesize/Distinguish
Arizona (a).
Arkansas Little Rock B(2)(b).
Barry II(f).
Belmont II: first bullet.
Concordia B(8).
Dayton Outcome 3: criteria 2 & 5.
Denver Legal Analysis: lines 4 & 5.
Florida Coastal "Critical thinking, legal analysis, and problem-solving."
UMass 1.3.2–1.3.4.
St. John's 2(d).
Tennessee 4(b).
Texas Tech Outcome 2: criteria 5 & 6.
Thomas Jefferson II(A).
Texas Southern first bullet.
South Dakota Outcome 2:2.
Widener Other Professional Skills: II(C) & II(E).
Law School Location of Citation/Format Compliance
Barry II(d).
Minnesota 2(iv).
St. John's 4(e).
Texas Tech Outcome 3: criterion 3.
Thomas Jefferson V(B).
South Dakota Outcome 4:5.
Villanova Outcome 5.1.
Widener Other Professional Skills: III(B) & IV(A).
Law School Location of Client Interviewing
Albany Aspirational Goals: fourth bullet.
Belmont II: sixth bullet.
CUNY (b)(6): first bullet & (b)(8): third bullet.
California Western Knowledge I.
Chapman Outcome 1.
Concordia B(11).
Hofstra 6(f).
Loyola Chicago I:7(b) & 7(c).
Minnesota 3(ii).
Montana Outcome 2: seventh bullet.
Northern Kentucky "Conduct interviews."
Penn State 7(g).
Thomas Jefferson VII(A)(1)(a).
Texas Southern fifth bullet.
Washburn 4.3.
Whittier Outcome 4: third bullet.
Widener Other Professional Skills: IV(C).
Law School Location of Counseling
Belmont II: sixth bullet.
California Western Knowledge I.
Chicago Kent 4(a) & 4(c).
Drake Outcome 3.
Fordham Outcome 6.
Hofstra 6(e).
Loyola Chicago I:7.
Minnesota 3(iv).
Montana Outcome 2: seventh bullet.
Ohio State 3.
Temple 4.2.
Tennessee 6(c).
Thomas Jefferson VII(A)(1)(b).
Villanova Outcome 4.3 & 4.5.
Washburn 4.3.
Whittier Outcome 4: third bullet.
Widener Other Professional Skills: IV(C).
Law School Location of Document Drafting
CUNY (b)(7): first bullet.
Chicago Kent 3(a)–3(g).
Concordia B(14).
Drake Outcome 3.
Hofstra 4(b).
Loyola Chicago I:6.
Marquette Outcome 1: second bullet.
Montana Outcome 2: twelfth bullet.
Northern Kentucky "Draft a contract," "Draft a lease," &c.
Penn State 5(b).
South Carolina Goal 2: outcome 3.
St. John's 4(a)–4(c).
Thomas Jefferson VII(A)(2)(d) & –(3)(a).
Washburn 4.5.
Whittier Outcome 4: fourth bullet.
Widener Other Professional Skills: I(B).
Law School Location of Identifying Authority
Barry II(d).
CUNY (b)(5): fourth bullet.
Chicago Kent 2(a) & 3(b).
Dayton Outcome 5: criterion 2.
Denver Legal Analysis: line 3.
Drake Outcome 4.
Fordham Outcome 2.
UMass 2.3.4.
St. John's 3(c) & 3(d).
Texas Tech Outcome 2: criterion 4 & Outcome 3: criterion 1.
South Dakota Outcome 3:4.
St. Thomas (MN) Outcome 5.
Villanova Outcome 3:2.
Widener Legal Methods: I & III.
Law School Location of Identifying Authority
Arizona (e).
Barry II(e).
Belmont II: sixth bullet.
Brooklyn Legal Analysis and Reasoning. Second bullet point.
Columbus

4.3

CUNY (b)(3).
Drake Outcome 3.
Fordham Outcome 6.

Hofstra

5(b).
Loyola Chicago I:4.
Loyola New Orleans Research and Information Gathering.
Missouri Professional Goals. First bullet point.
Mitchell-Hamline Resarch and Investigation.
Montana Outcome 2: fourth bullet.
New York Law School Ninth line.
Northern Kentucky "Conduct adequate discovery (and identify what is adequate)."
St. John's 3(a).
Seton Hall (b). Twelfth bullet.
Syracuse Fourth Outcome. Second bullet point.
Tennessee 6(e).
Thomas Jefferson VII(A)(2)(a).
Villanova Outcome 3:4.
Washburn 4.2.
Washington Seventh bullet point.
Whittier Outcome 4: second bullet.
Widener Other Professional Skills: IV(D).
Law School Location of Issue-Spotting
Arkansas Little Rock B(1)(a) & B(2)(c).
Barry II(b).
Brooklyn Legal Analysis and Reasoning. First bullet point.
CUNY (b)(2): first bullet.
Chapman Outcome 7.
Chicago Kent 2(b).
Dayton Outcome 2.
Denver Legal Analysis: line 8.
Drake Outcome 1.
Fordham Outcome 4.
Hofstra 5(c).
Indiana Bloomington Critical Legal Analysis. Outcome 2.
Loyola Chicago I:1(a) & 2(a).
Loyola New Orleans Analysis and Reasoning
Marquette Outcome 2: first bullet.
UMass 1.3.1.
Montana Outcome 2: first bullet.
New Mexico "Legal Analysis and Reasoning."
New York Law School Fourth line.
Penn State 6(c).
Pitt Law Outcome 1.
St. John's 2(a).
St. Thomas (MN) Outcome 3.
Stetson 2(a).
Syracuse Second Outcome. Fourth bullet point.
Texas Tech Outcome 2: criterion 2.
Thomas Jefferson II(A).
Villanova Outcome 4.1.
Whittier Outcome 2.
Widener Other Professional Skills: II(A).
UMass PC1.3.1.
Law School Location of Live/Simulated Representation
Creighton 10.
Florida Coastal "Law practice readiness."
Law School Location of Mediation/Conflict Resolution
CUNY (b)(6): second bullet.
Dayton Outcome 6: criterion 3.
Drake Outcome 3
Loyola Chicago I:9.
Maryland 5.
Montana Outcome 2: eleventh bullet.
South Carolina Goal 2: outcome 4.
Tennessee 6(d).
Thomas Jefferson IV(A) & VII(A)(2)(e).
Law School Location of Negotiation
CUNY (b)(8): third bullet.
California Western Knowledge I.
Chicago Kent 4(d).
Concordia B(13).
Drake Outcome 3.
Fordham Outcome 6.
George Mason Outcome 3.
Hofstra 6(d).
Loyola Chicago I:8.
Minnesota 2(i).
Montana Outcome 2: tenth bullet.
South Carolina Goal 2: outcome 4.
Temple 4.2.
Tennessee 6(a).
Thomas Jefferson VII(A)(2)(b) & –(3)(b).
Villanova Outcome 7.3.
Washburn 4.4.
Whittier Outcome 4: third bullet.
Widener Other Professional Skills: IV(F).
Law School Location of Online Research/Technology
Barry II(c).
Chicago Kent 4(f).
Columbus 4.5.
Denver Legal Research: line 1.
Drake Outcome 4.
Hofstra 6(n).
Mississippi Outcome 3.
Montana Outcome 2: thirteenth bullet.
South Carolina Goal 2: outcome 1.
South Dakota Outcomes 3:2 & 3.3.
Stetson 3(b).
Tennessee 6(i).
Thomas Jefferson III(A).
Tulane second bullet.
Villanova Outcome 3:3.
Widener Other Professional Skills: III(A).
Law School Location of Persuasion/Knowing Audience
Arkansas Little Rock B(4).
Belmont II: third bullet.
CUNY (b)(7): second bullet & (b)(8): first bullet.
Chapman Outcome 3.
Chicago Kent 3(d) & 3(h).
Concordia B(16).
Dayton Outcome 4: criteria 1 & 2.
Denver Legal Writing: lines 2–4.
Fordham Outcome 5.
Loyola Marymount (4): objective 1.
Maryland 6.
McGeorge Outcome 4.
Minnesota 2(ii).
Montana Outcome 2: sixth bullet.
South Carolina Goal 2: outcome 2.
South Dakota Outcome 4:2.
Temple 4.4.
Tennessee 3(b).
Texas Tech Outcome 4: criterion 1.
Thomas Jefferson V(A).
Widener Legal Methods: IV.
Law School Location of Policy Arguments
Arizona (a).
Concordia B(7).
Hofstra 5(j).
UMass 1.3.6.
Minnesota I(iv).
Temple 2.1–2.4 & 4.2.
Thomas Jefferson II(A).
Washburn 2.2b.
Widener Other Professional Skills: II(H).
Law School Location of Precise Language
Arizona (c).
Arkansas Little Rock B(4).
Chapman Outcome 3.
Chicago Kent 3(g).
Creighton 3.
Dayton Outcome 4: criterion 1.
Drake Outcome 2.
Florida Coastal "Communication/Advocacy."
Fordham Outcome 5.
Loyola Chicago I:6(f).
Marquette Outcome 1: second bullet.
UMass 2.1.1–2.1.4.
Minnesota 2(iii).
St. John's 4(d).
Temple 3.1.
Tennessee 4(a).
Thomas Jefferson V(B).
Texas Southern second bullet.
South Dakota Outcome 4:1.
Villanova Outcome 5.1.
Washburn 3.1.
Widener Other Professional Skills: I(A)–(C).
Law School Location of Public Speaking/Oral Argument
Barry II(g).
Belmont II: fourth bullet.
Brooklyn Legal Analysis and Reasoning. Seventh bullet point.
Chicago Kent 3(h).
Columbia 4.1.
Denver Legal Communication. Fourth Outcome.
Drake Outcome 3.
George Mason Outcome 3.
Hofstra 5(h) & 6(m).
Indiana Bloomington Lawyering Skills. Outcome 1.
Loyola New Orleans Communication.
Marquette Outcome 1: third bullet.
McGeorge Outcome 4.
Missouri Procedural and Skill-Based Goals. Second bullet.
Northern Kentucky "Make an extemporaneous oral presentation."
Penn State 6(f) & 7(n).
St. John's 4(f).
Stetson 4(b).
Temple 3.2.
Tennessee 4(f).
Texas Tech Outcome 4: criterion 2.
Texas Southern sixth bullet.
UMass PC2.1.3 & PC2.1.4.
South Dakota Outcome 4:3.
Villanova Outcome 5.5.
Washburn 3.2.
Widener Other Professional Skills: I(C).
Willamette 5(d).
Law School Location of Time Management/Planning
Arizona (e).
Arkansas Little Rock B(1)(c), –(d), & B(3).
Belmont II: sixth bullet.
Concordia B(10.3).
CUNY (b)(5): second bullet.
Dayton Outcome 5: criterion 1 & Outcome 6: criterion 2.
Loyola Chicago I:3(c) & 11.
Marquette Outcome 4: first bullet.
Minnesota 3(v).
Tennessee 5(h).
Texas Tech Outcome 3: criterion 2.
South Dakota Outcome 3:1.
Villanova Outcome 3:1.
Widener Other Professional Skills: III(C).