Our Academic Achievement program is designed to help you succeed both academically and personally during your law school experience. Our support begins at orientation when all incoming first-year students are invited to attend a four-day voluntary academic success program (VASP) and continues throughout the rest of law school with tutoring services, advice, skills training, practice exams and other types of support you may need. In addition to the support of our Director Scott Swanson provides, the University also offers a host of services to help you succeed.
Finally, after graduation Mr. Swanson works closely with you to prepare for the bar exam.
Incoming students are invited to take part in the School of Law's four-day Academic Success Program during First Week Orientation. In just four days, Scott Swanson, Director of Academic Achievement, will lead the class through the different types of work that will be required in a law school semester. The schedule includes:
Case briefs, class preparation, and discussion of case law regarding Homicide.
Continue discussion of Homicide and Defenses.
Create outline of Homicide and Defenses. Create group answer to practice Essay Test question.
Test Preparation and Practice Test (which will be individually critiqued during the early part of the semester, before midterms, so that you can consolidate what your have learned in your first law school testing situation.)
All first year, first semester substantive classes have mid-term examinations. A number of students find that they would like assistance in preparing for first year, first semester midterm exams--in addition to the assistance they have received as a result of their first exam-taking exercise in the Voluntary Academic Success Program. We help those students learn additional organizational skills, review practice exams, and prepare effective outlines for their classes.
Additionally, many students find that they would like additional specific, timely, concrete feedback on the outcome of their mid-term exams—feedback beyond simply the grade. We review exams with those students, help them understand what they have done well, and areas in which they can make improvements.
The Director of Academic Achievement is available to meet with individual students (for specific tutorial assistance) and will larger groups of students who would like assistance in preparation for final exams. That involves a wide range of options, from practicing specific skills to assistance and critiques of particular outline strategies.
The Director of Academic Achievement is available (again, for both individuals and groups) to help students on an ongoing basis with more effective study habits, classroom preparation, and ongoing assistance in understanding the substantive materials in their classroom work.
There are a few students who, for a variety of reasons, have a difficult time performing up to their own expectations in law school. We pride ourselves in providing support for those people, and will work in any way we can to make sure that law school is a productive experience.
The law school currently provides a seminar-sized class that works with third year students who identify themselves as students who continue to have concerns about their academic performance, particularly as it relates to taking and passing a bar exam.
Additionally, for those who do not take this class, the school provides an informal summer program for graduates that emphasizes the skills necessary to pass the bar exam. That program is available to all students. Samples of past Bar Prep Class Sessions.
The following links are video and audio links to Scott Swanson's ScottBar Bar Prep. New videos and audio links will be posted the day after the class.
Minnesota will become a Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) jurisdiction beginning with the February 2014 bar exam. In January 2013 the Minnesota Supreme Court approved the petition of the Minnesota State Board of Law Examiners to amend the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Minnesota.
The UBE was designed to provide consistent content and registration across jurisdictions. The primary advantage is an examinee’s score is “portable”—the score can be reported to all other UBE jurisdictions (receiving jurisdictions) when determining whether the person has met the requirements for admission to the receiving jurisdiction’s bar. Based on efforts by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), the Conference of Chief Judges, and the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, the following jurisdictions have adopted the UBE: Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Score portability. Since all UBE jurisdictions are taking the same exam on the same days, the score is portable and can be reported to other jurisdictions. Regionally, with the recent North Dakota oil boom, this will be helpful to Minnesota attorneys who take the UBE and whose firms subsequently expand to practice in North Dakota (another UBE jurisdiction.)
Individual state requirements still exist. All jurisdictions have the ability to require an applicant to meet other requirements for admission, which include a separate character and fitness determination, and, in a few of the jurisdictions adopting the UBE so far, a separate test on state-specific topics.
States differ on passing score. A score that passes one state may not be sufficient to pass another state. For example, while Minnesota requires a passing score of 260, several other jurisdictions have a passing score that is a little bit higher (262 is a pretty common requirement). Specific state information can be found in the Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements produced by the ABA and NCBE.
Time limits on transferability. A receiving state may place limitations on the length of time an applicant may transfer a score to that jurisdiction. Minnesota, for example, will require that the score be transferred as part of an application that is submitted within three years of the original test date.
Retroactive transferability. A receiving state which has recently adopted the UBE may choose to allow applicants to submit a score from another UBE jurisdiction that is from a test prior to that state’s adoption of the UBE. It’s unclear from the Minnesota Supreme Court’s order adopting the UBE in Minnesota whether that will be the case here in Minnesota.
Potential for additional jurisdictions adopting UBE. Now that Minnesota has joined, there are 13 UBE jurisdictions. There are nine or ten additional jurisdictions that are seriously considering becoming UBE jurisdictions. If that were to happen, it would increase the positive impact of the adoption of this exam for future examinees, and might increase the positive impact for examinees who have taken the exam in the past.
Format of the UBE. The Uniform Bar Examination consists of three components, all of which are drafted and distributed by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE):
Substantive content changes. Some topics will no longer be tested on the UBE. No longer being tested: Ethics and Professional Responsibility (tested on the MPRE); Federal Individual Income Taxation, Uniform Commercial Code, Art. 1, 2. Added topics: Conflicts of Laws, Negotiable Instruments (Commercial Paper) and Secured Transactions.
For additional information, contact Scott Swanson, Director of Academic Achievement.
2012 July Exam: 88.55%
2011 July Exam: 91.95%
2010 July Exam: 93.91%
2009 July Exam: 90.74%
2008 July Exam: 89.91%
2007 July Exam: 88.39%
2006 July Exam: 90.82%
2005 July Exam: 85.92%
2004 July Exam: 84.15%