Geoscientists as leaders: our mission and its' relationship to the St. Thomas mission
The
following is the text of an address given by geology department chair
Tom Hickson, on the occasion of the 2006 Alumni Gathering, held on
November 30:
Late last year and into the Fall semester, the geology faculty spent
some time thinking about our mission. I must admit that I was not
much of a "mission statement" kind of guy and "strategic planning"
sounded--to this academic soul--a bit too much like
corporate-speak. But I have become convinced that it is vitally
important for a department to have a clear idea of what it is trying to
do, to have something to point to, to reflect against, to provide us
something solid with which to evaluate our progress. So we agreed
on the following:
The geology department seeks to support the UST Mission by providing a
challenging program that welcomes all students into science, allows
students to grow as individuals and stewards of the planet, and creates
scientifically-informed problem-solvers
I think that I would like to emphasize two elements of this mission
statement tonight: "supporting the UST mission" and "stewardship
of the planet."
Consider the St. Thomas mission:
Inspired by Catholic intellectual tradition, the University of St.
Thomas educates students to be morally responsible leaders who
think critically, act wisely and work skillfully to advance the common
good.
It is the goal of the St. Thomas mission to "advance the common good"
and it is in this way that I feel that geology is uniquely poised
amongst the sciences (and, indeed, amongst all of the departments at
UST) to support this mission.
Your degrees say, or will say, "geology". But this is, as you all
know, an oversimplification. Geology is the study of the Earth,
how it works, and how it
will work in the future. It is
fundamentally an interdisciplinary science, and as a result, is
fundamentally a science for the liberal arts. It is a science
that can welcome non-scientists and somehow, magically, turn them into
scientists. It is a science of careful observation and
interpretation and as a geologist, we know how to work with scant and
conflicting data: the stuff of the real world.
If we consider protecting our planet synonymous with protecting the
common good (which, I would vehemently argue, we must begin to do more
consciously and conscientiously), who else understands what is "normal"
for the earth? Who else can say whether we are being good
stewards, given that humans have only been around for a couple million
years and, as you all know, that the Earth worked perfectly well
without them (give or take a few mass extinctions)? Who better than
geoscientists to serve as morally responsible leaders?
It is in this sense that we intentionally used the phrase "stewards of
the planet" in our mission: how can one be a steward of something
they do not understand? How can we protect one of the most
fundamental elements of "the common good" without having some notion of
how this complex, beautiful, violent, and always-engaging planet
functions? In this respect, you--as geologists--play a unique role
in supporting the morals and values of this university--whether you are
Catholic, Lutheran, atheist, Wiccan, Baptist, or agnostic--because you
are the people that can most effectively integrate the sciences and
apply what you know to very complex issues like:
-
The role of humans in global warming
-
Predicting hazards like tsunami and coastal flooding
-
Understanding how to create a clean and safe water supply
-
How to use resources in a sustainable fashion, whether it's oil, iron, or platinum group elements
And each of us knows that "protecting the common good" is also a matter
of social justice. That inequities in resource allocation and use
are fundamentally tied to issues of poverty. That natural
disasters disproportionately effect the poorest in our world. If
this is not a nexus for faith and science, I don't know what one
is. This is substantiated by a letter sent to Senator Norm
Coleman last week, signed by Archbishop Flynn and 27 other Minnesota
faith leaders--including rabbis and imams--urging him to support global
reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and calling global warming a "religious issue".
What we hope to do in geology at St. Thomas is "create morally
responsible leaders" that are uniquely scientifically trained to become
better stewards of our planet. Many of you--whether you come from
the Brownstein/Farnham era or are of the more recent
Lamb/Hickson/Theissen lineage--have become leaders of this type by
default. You may not know it, you may not feel it, but your
uniquely geological perspective on the world has an impact on you and
your relationships. You may only be a leader sometime. You
may only lead a few people at random times in your life. But I
would encourage you to consider what you, as geoscientists (practicing
or non-praticing), bring to the table and how you can lead on issues
that will "advance the common good".