Collaborative
Inquiry:
Improving
Teaching and Learning at the University
of St. Thomas
Bush Foundation Program Grant 2002-05
Summary of the
Bush Grant
The central idea of
the Bush Foundation’s grant to UST for undergraduate faculty development is to improve
students’ higher-order thinking skills by employing more inquiry-based
instruction and increasing the levels of faculty/student collaboration.
Higher-order thinking skills go beyond memorization and recall to apply knowledge to new
situations, make inferences, evaluate evidence, analyze data, and express
results. Inquiry-based instruction is a family of pedagogies that
incorporate the investigative processes actually used in the disciplines. Among the methods used in this kind of
teaching are case studies, action research, community-based problem solving,
field investigation, and research-based or discovery-oriented instruction. These teaching methods model the
“real-world” work of the academic disciplines.
It is not the more
traditional model of learning in which students “learn” lecture and reading
material in a passive way and are evaluated using one-dimensional forms of
assessment such as multiple-choice exams.
It is not the use of exercises that have a “right answer” that can be
found using only a single process of inquiry.
It is not learning based solely or primarily on recall. We wish to move away from such pedagogies,
creating active instruction that requires students to discover knowledge. We want our students to learn that they can
ask a well-formed question and figure out what leads to plausible answers; that
they need to think and re-think what they’re doing, as they will have to do
beyond the university.
Thus, the broad goals and specific objectives of the grant are to:
1. Goal: enhance student learning by improving higher-order thinking skills.
Objectives: To
increase students’ level of conceptual understanding and their ability to apply
knowledge to new situations, think independently, and evaluate and communicate
their inquiry process.
2. Goal: encourage inquiry-based methods
of instruction across the curriculum.
Objectives: To provide models that successfully apply inquiry-based
methods in areas such as: writing to learn, interdisciplinary learning,
theme-based learning, community-based projects, and service-learning; and to
increase faculty/student collaboration across the curriculum.
3.
Goal: infuse collaborative inquiry into
the culture of the University of St. Thomas.
Objective: To
publicize the effect of inquiry-based methods on student learning and classroom
instruction.
Together with UST
matching funds, the Bush Foundation’s grant award is for $2,000,000 over three
years, renewable for three more years.
Many of those funds will be regranted through two sets of programs:
1) grants to faculty:
· Project Grants: to implement inquiry-based teaching methods in
undergraduate courses
· Core and Core Area Grants: to enhance inquiry-based teaching of
core and core area courses
· Seed Grants: to support implementation of inquiry-based projects
with external funding
· Dissemination Grants: to disseminate Collaborative Inquiry results
at conferences
2) grants to students and their faculty
mentors for student/faculty
collaboration:
These grants are
administered through the Young Scholars
program. The Young Scholars program
awards $3,000 to a student and $500 to their faculty mentor for collaborative
scholarship. Students submit a proposal
in April and are funded for 12 weeks of work during the summer. (More information about the Young Scholars
program is available at the Bush Grant website below).
Faculty applying for any Collaborative Inquiry funding are
encouraged to read the full 20-page grant proposal, available at www.stthomas.edu/bushgrant. Pages 6-9 provide examples of Collaborative
Inquiry projects.
Guidelines for
Grants to Faculty
Proposal Review Criteria
Reviewers must
determine from the proposal narrative whether the project can make an
appropriate and effective contribution to the goals of the Bush grant for
Collaborative Inquiry. Reviewers will
be looking at the following criteria:
·
Is the proposal clear, concise, and written for a general audience?
·
What evidence is there of the need for the project?
·
How, exactly, will students’ higher-order thinking skills be improved?
·
How will the project director know that students’ thinking skills are improved
(i.e. is there a good evaluation plan)?
·
Is the project sustainable or will it end at the end of the grant period?
·
Will the project director adequately disseminate results?
Required Forms
for all four of these grants are given on the following pages and consist of:
1) Cover
Sheet,
2) Budget
Format page
3) Grant
Application Checklist.
1) Cover Sheet
Select one:
___ Project Grant
___ Core and Core
Area Grant
___ Seed Grant
___ Dissemination
Grant
Name:_____________________________
Dept./Program: _____________________
Mail
# ______________Phone # _________ E-mail:___________________________
The
date of my initial full-time employment at UST was: _______________________ and
the status of my present employment (tenured, tenure-track, limited term,
adjunct) at UST is: _________________________.
1. Title of proposed project:
2. Description
of project suitable for use in publicity and reporting to a general audience
(not to exceed 50 words; avoid use of jargon):
3.
Intended start date:
_______________
Project
duration (in months): ________
4. Total amount requested: ___________
5. Have you previously received 2002-05
Bush Grant funds? ___ Yes ___ No
If
yes, please describe:
2) Budget
Format page for:
Project Grants (maximum: $1,500)
for curriculum development, faculty partnerships
Core and Core
Area Grants (maximum amount in
the case of conference attendance is $14,400 per team; maximum for retreats and
meetings is $6,150 per team).
Seed Grants (maximum: $250 for
<$10,000 external request; $500 for >$10,000 request)
Dissemination
Grants (maximum: $1,000/individual, to a maximum of
$3,000/team; $5,000 total available for departmental requests)
· Applicants are expected to provide
reasonably detailed estimates of all expenses.
· Capital equipment (>$500) may not be
purchased with these funds.
· The Proposal Narrative should give reviewers
adequate justification for general categories of expenses. Detailed expenses and other calculations
must be provided in a Budget Explanation.
· Other sources of funding should be detailed
in a Budget Explanation, as applicable:
· Indicate whether or not you have applied for
internal or external funding of this project in addition to UST’s Bush
Foundation grant. As appropriate, list
names of funding programs, both internal and external, and specify which
expenses those programs are expected to cover.
This should also be reflected on the Budget form and in supporting
documentation (such as a letter of commitment).
· If currently funded by any UST Bush Foundation
grants, list the grant type, year of award, and project title of each grant
received.
BUDGET ITEM Grant Request Other Funding Total
1. Personnel / Director Stipend __________ ___________ ___________
2. Travel expenses ___________ ___________ ___________
a.
Lodging ___________
b.
Transportation ___________
c.
Meals ___________
d.
Conference Fee ___________
e.
Other (give detail) ___________
3. Supplies, e.g. books
and
refreshments ___________ ___________ ___________
4. Duplicating, postage,
telephone __________
5. Other (provide
detail) ___________ ___________ ___________
TOTAL REQUESTED: ___________ ___________ ___________
3) Grant
Application Checklist
Please complete this
checklist and submit with your application, which is due by 5:00 p.m. on the
following dates:
For
work beginning in: Due Notification Date
Summer April 1 June 1
Fall July
15 August 1
J Term October 1 November 1
Spring November 1 December 1
Submit the application
to: Bush Grant, Mail # JRC 432.
Check that your
application package contains eight complete, collated copies of the following:
___ A.
Cover Sheet
___ B.
Proposal Narrative
___ C. Budget Format page and Budget Explanation (not required for Seed Grants)
___ D. Copies of supporting documentation, if
applicable
___ E. Two-page vitae (not required for Core
and Core Area Grants)
___ F. Grant Application Checklist (this sheet,
signed and dated)
Other items to
acknowledge:
___ G. Final
reports
I do not have any
final reports due for previous UST Bush grants.
___ H.
Protection of Human Subjects of Research
I understand that if
my research will involve human subjects, I must seek approval from UST's
Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research
(IRB) before beginning the project. See the IRB website for information:
http://www.stthomas.edu/irb
___ I.
Final Report
Within three months
of my project’s completion date, I
agree to submit to Program Coordinator Vanca Shrunk (c/o Bush Grant Mail # JRC
432, idschrunk@stthomas.edu, 2-5740) the following: 1) a project evaluation
report, 2) an accounting of funds spent, and 3) assessment results. I
understand that submission of this final report is a prerequisite for any
future funding from UST’s Bush grant for Collaborative Inquiry.
Applicant
Signature:_____________________________________________
Date:____________
Project Grants
The purpose of Project
Grants is to help faculty implement courses that use inquiry-based teaching
methods. For example, instead of
lectures describing five ways for a retail business to estimate its trade area
(where most customers come from), the instructor crafts curriculum that leads
students to think through data provided by a real “client” and implement
various methods of trade area estimation.
The five methods are still taught, but they are applied in a real
situation with all of the messy problems that accompany actual
applications. This process makes
students (and professors) think instead of memorize. It
encourages
higher-order thinking (such as applying knowledge to new situations, thinking
independently, and communicating results).
It models the discipline as it is actually applied. Pages 6-9 of
the grant proposal give several other examples of inquiry-based
pedagogies. The proposal is available
at: www.stthomas.edu/bushgrant.
Project Grants are
designed to support faculty who are making substantial changes in pedagogy;
such changes would often affect a whole course. Activities involved might include further learning about the
pedagogy in some way (readings, attending a conference or workshop, observing
faculty who use the technique or strategy), preparing the materials needed to
implement the pedagogy in the course and to evaluate the results, etc.
Project Grants could
be used to develop introductory courses, interdisciplinary or international
courses, first-year courses, or an extension of the university’s existing
“paired courses,” in which students enroll in two courses as a cohort and
faculty may coordinate readings, projects, etc. Course development may also include expansion of the
paired-course model to upper-division courses.
Project Grants can
also be used for faculty partnerships, where a faculty member who is
experienced with inquiry-based pedagogies mentors a colleague who wants use
those methods.
Project Grants are
primarily intended as summer stipends for faculty, as well as funding the
purchase of books, materials, consultants, or transportation costs, to a
maximum of $1,500 per faculty member or faculty partnership. Funds available in
2002-03 are $19,000.
Expectations:
Products that are
expected from these grants will include revised syllabi and exercises, a report
describing how the pedagogies are to be implemented in the course, and
agreement on the part of the faculty member to measure the effects on student
learning. Assessment tools for this purpose are
described on pages 9-14 of the original proposal to the Bush Foundation,
available at www.stthomas.edu/bushgrant. Additional assessment tools will be posted on that website as
they become available.
Project Grant
Application Instructions
Application
deadline: Submit eight copies of a
complete Project Grant application according to the dates given on the Grant
Application Checklist.
A complete Project
Grant Application consists of:
A. Cover Sheet
(required)
B. Proposal Narrative
not exceeding four double-spaced pages of 12-point type (see Guidelines below)
C. Budget Format
page and Budget Explanation (required)
D. Two-page vitae
(required)
E. Supporting
documentation (as appropriate)
F. Grant Application
Checklist (required)
Guidelines for Project Grant Narrative
The proposal
narrative is expected to describe or explain the items listed below. Remember
that the review committee is an interdisciplinary group of faculty. Do not
assume knowledge of the jargon or techniques of your discipline.
1. Brief
Abstract (~200 words)
2. Rationale / Need for the project: Describe the teaching methodology you
currently use in the course(s) affected by your project. Why are you proposing to change? What aspects of teaching/learning in those
course(s) could be enhanced? What
aspects of students' learning will be affected? What higher-order thinking
skills will be affected? How?
3. Goals and Objectives: This section will state broad project goals,
but must also include specific, measurable objectives. When your project is completed, reasonable
people should be able to agree on whether or not the objectives have been
met. Your goals and objectives must
support those of the Bush grant, stated above in the “Summary of the Bush
Grant.”
4. Project activities: What do you propose to do? How will you raise students’ higher-order
thinking skills? Describe how you plan
to achieve your project's goals and objectives. Indicate what specific products (assignments, cases, etc.) may
result from your work. Include a clear
timetable for project activities.
5. Preparation
for the project: What previous work
have you done that relates to the project? For example, you might have attended
a conference on a particular pedagogical technique, read books or articles
about this approach, analyzed student outcomes, observed classes that employ
the methodology you wish to implement, etc.
Please be specific.
6. Evaluation: What means will you use to evaluate your project? How will you
assess whether you have met your objectives?
How will you assess the impact of this change on your students' learning?
(NOTE: Refer to pp. 9-14 of the Bush grant proposal at www.stthomas.edu/bushgrant.
Additional assessment tools will be posted on that website as they become
available.
7. Dissemination: How will you share the results of this work
with others (1) at St. Thomas? (2) more broadly? Be specific. Some ideas:
a departmental seminar, article for Synergia, poster or paper presented at a
disciplinary meeting, journal articles, presentation at conferences of The
Collaboration for the Advancement of College Teaching & Learning, etc.
Core and Core
Area Grants
The purpose of Core
and Core Area Grants is to support groups of faculty to plan strategies to
implement inquiry-based teaching methods in core and core-area courses. (Core and Core Area courses are listed in
the Undergraduate Catalog 2000-02 on
pages 21-26). If an individual faculty
member wants to revise a single core or core-area course on an experimental
basis, they should apply for a Project Grant. Core and Core Area Grants are
appropriate for groups of faculty, e.g. departments or groups of faculty who
teach a core or core area course and wish to revise that course in a
coordinated way, or if they want to examine their curriculum in the light of
inquiry-based teaching.
Core and Core Area grants
will fund groups of faculty to attend conferences or hold meetings or retreats
to learn about and plan inquiry-based pedagogies. Such conferences and meetings might be held in any U.S. or
Canadian city, here on campus, or at the Gainey Center. These grants support travel, meeting costs
and supporting materials, e.g. books or a speaker.
Expectations:
Products that are
expected from these grants will include concrete plans of how to revise a
course or curriculum with the kinds of pedagogies supported by this grant. There should also be a plan to measure the
effects on student learning. Assessment
tools for this purpose are described on pages 9-14 of the original proposal to
the Bush Foundation, available at www.stthomas.edu/bushgrant. Additional
assessment tools will be posted on that website as they become available.
The maximum amount
for Core and Core Area Grants in the case of conference attendance is $14,400
(calculated at $1,200 x 12 faculty).
The maximum for retreats and meetings is $6,150 per team (calculated at
Gainey rates of $205/day x 30).
Available funds for both sorts of activities in 2002-03 are $27,300.
Core and Core Area Grant Application Instructions
Application
deadline: Submit eight copies of a
complete Core and Core Area Grant application according to the dates given on
the Grant Application Checklist.
A complete Core and
Core Area Grant application consists of:
A. Cover Sheet (required)
B. Proposal Narrative not exceeding four double-spaced pages
of 12-point type (see Guidelines below)
C. Budget Format
page and Budget Explanation (required)
D. Supporting
documentation (as appropriate)
E. Grant Application
Checklist (required)
Guidelines for Core and Core Area Grant Narrative
The proposal
narrative is expected to describe or explain the items listed below. Remember that the review committee is an
interdisciplinary group of faculty. Do not assume knowledge of the jargon or
techniques of your discipline.
1. Brief
Abstract (~200 words)
2. Rationale / Need for the project: Describe the teaching methodology currently
used in the course(s) affected by your project. Why are you proposing to change?
What aspects of teaching/learning in those course(s) could be
enhanced? What aspects of students'
learning will be affected? How?
3. Goals and Objectives: This section will state broad project goals,
but must also include specific, measurable objectives. When your project is completed, reasonable
people should be able to agree on whether or not the objectives have been met. Your goals
and objectives must support those of the Bush grant, stated above in the
“Summary of the Bush Grant.”
4. Project activities: What do you propose to do? Describe how you plan to achieve your
project's goals and objectives. Indicate
what specific products (syllabi, curricular structure, etc.) may result from
your work. Include a clear timetable
for project activities.
5. Preparation
for the project: What previous work
has been done that relates to the project? For example, team members might have
attended a conference on a particular pedagogical technique, read books or
articles about this approach, analyzed student outcomes, observed classes that
employ the methodology you wish to implement, etc. Please be specific.
6. Evaluation: What means will you use to evaluate your project? How will you
assess whether you have met your objectives?
How will you assess the impact of this change on your students' learning?
(NOTE: Refer to pp. 9-14 of the Bush grant proposal at www.stthomas.edu/bushgrant.
Additional assessment tools will be posted on that website as they become
available).
7. Dissemination: How will you share the results of this work
with others (1) at St. Thomas? (2) more broadly? Be specific. Some ideas:
an article for Synergia, poster or paper presented at a disciplinary meeting,
journal articles, presentation at conferences of The Collaboration for the
Advancement of College Teaching & Learning, etc.
Seed Grants
The purpose of Seed
Grants is to provide stipends for faculty who write proposals for external
funding to support implementation of pedagogies that are part of the Bush
Foundation
grant. Seed Grant funds are disbursed
only upon submission of a proposal.
Seed Grants provide
a) $250 as a faculty stipend to prepare and submit a proposal that requests
less than $10,000 or b) $500 for a proposal greater than $10,000. Seed Grants are awarded for preparation of a
proposal, whether or not the proposal is funded. External funding may come from
federal, state, or local public agencies, professional organizations,
corporations, and foundations. Proposals must evolve in consultation with the
Faculty Grants Office (FGO) or the Office of Corporate & Foundation
Relations (CFR), with proposal authors responding to review comments from the
FGO or CFR Director to enhance the proposal’s competitiveness. Available funds
in 2002-03 are $7,500.
Expectations:
The expected product
is a grant proposal that is completed in cooperation with FGO and/or CFR and
then submitted for external funding.
Seed Grant Application Instructions
Application
deadline: Submit eight copies of a
complete Seed Grant application according to the dates given on the Grant
Application Checklist.
A complete Seed Grant
Application consists of:
A. Cover Sheet
(required)
B. Proposal Narrative not exceeding two double-spaced pages
of 12-point type (see Guidelines below)
C. Two-page vitae
(required)
D. Supporting
documentation (as appropriate)
E. Grant Application
Checklist (required)
Guidelines for Seed Grant Narrative
The proposal
narrative is expected to describe or explain the items listed below. Remember
that the review committee is an interdisciplinary group of faculty. Do not assume knowledge of the jargon or
techniques of your discipline.
1) How are the goals
and objectives of your planned proposal related to pedagogies of the Bush
Foundation Program Grant?
2) Describe the activities that will reach those goals. What will you do with the grant funds?
3) What agencies or programs are you aware of that might be
interested in your proposal?
4) How much money do you plan to seek?
Dissemination
Grants
Dissemination Grants
will be awarded in three categories:
A) Grants to disseminate results of faculty/student
collaborative work, when that
work contributes to the professional development of a discipline. Dissemination Grants fund travel and
conference registration when faculty and students participate together. For example, faculty and their students
could have carried out a summer research project or been funded through a UST
Young Scholars grant. The faculty
member and student(s) may apply for a Dissemination Grant to present the
results of their collaborative work at professional meetings.
B) Support for departmental sponsorship of a statewide
annual research meeting in a
particular discipline. These
conferences must clearly advance the goals of the Collaborative Inquiry
project. Allowable costs in this case
could include keynote speaker fees, conference mailings and advertising, or
food and reception expenses.
C) Grants to disseminate successful inquiry-based pedagogies. Faculty members
who become skilled in particular inquiry-based teaching methods or
faculty/student collaborations, and want to present results about these
pedagogies, may apply
for funding of
conference registration and travel.
Expectations:
The Bush Program
Grant Coordinator will expect to receive a file copy or summary of materials
presented at the conference.
The maximum request
is $1,000/person, with a maximum award of $3,000 for one project group. In the case of departmental sponsorship of a
statewide annual research meeting, a total of $5,000 is allocated for this
purpose in 2002-03. Available funds for all Dissemination Grants in 2002-03 are
$15,000.
Dissemination Grant Application Instructions
Application
deadline: Submit eight copies of a
complete Dissemination Grant application according to the dates given on the
Grant Application Checklist.
A complete Dissemination
Grant application consists of:
A. Cover Sheet
(required)
B. Proposal
Narrative not exceeding four double-spaced pages of 12-point type, or two pages
for category A (see Guidelines below)
C. Budget Format
page and Budget Explanation (required)
D. Two-page vitae
(not required for category B)
E. Supporting
documentation (as appropriate)
F. Grant Application
Checklist (required)
Guidelines for Dissemination Grant Narrative
The proposal
narrative is expected to describe or explain the items listed below. Remember
that the review committee is an interdisciplinary group of faculty. Do not assume knowledge of the jargon or
professional organizations in your discipline.
The proposal narrative must specify the category for which
funds are requested.
A) Grants to disseminate results of faculty/student
collaborative work
B) Support for departmental sponsorship of a statewide
annual research meeting
C) Grants to disseminate successful inquiry-based pedagogies
The narrative should
also provide the following information:
· thumbnail
description of the work that will be presented
· conference sponsors,
title, dates, and location
· explanation of the
nature and significance of the conference
· for category A, names
of faculty and students involved in the collaboration who will be traveling to
the conference
Budget Items
1. Dissemination of
findings of faculty/student collaborations or inquiry-based pedagogies may
include the following Travel expenses:
Lodging
Transportation
Meals
Conference
registration
Other
(describe)
2. For a department
seeking funds to host a research conference, budget items may include:
Conference
mailings and advertising (list as Duplicating, postage, telephone on the Budget
Format page)
Food
and reception expenses (list as Supplies on the Budget Format page and provide budget detail and justification
in Proposal Narrative)
Keynote
speaker fees (list as Other and provide budget detail and justification in
Proposal Narrative)
Other costs (consult with Bush grant staff on allowability of Other expenses in the Budget Format page, then provide budget detail and justification in the Proposal Narrative).